catch that instead of using a bare except clause.

catch that instead of using a bare except clause.

exception (for compatibility with old versions of Python).

Add a comment elsewhere making clear an assumption in the code.

a bare except clause.

so only catch that specific exception.

some stuff around.

constants used by other macros from the headers.

Conditionalize VREPRINT and VDISCARD; these are not available on HP-UX.

This closes bug #417418.

Finish the last set of changes to these files so the conversion does not
break.

For rich comparisons, use instance_getattr2() when possible to avoid
the expense of setting an AttributeError.  Also intern the name_op[]
table and use the interned strings rather than creating a new string
and interning it each time through.

Remove unused import of "sys".

If the file TESTFN exists before we start, try to remove it.

Add spaces around the = in some assignments.

"\begin{classdesc*}{SomeClass}" -- the rendering of \unspecified was
identical to \moreargs, so this helps clarify things just a little.

excclassdesc environment.

class without providing any information about the constructor.  This
should be used for classes which only exist to act as containers rather
than as factories for instances.

useful documentation on the Scrap Manager.

doesn't know how to do LE, LT, GE, GT.  dict_richcompare can't do the
latter any faster than dict_compare can.  More importantly, for
cmp(dict1, dict2), Python *first* tries rich compares with EQ, LT, and
GT one at a time, even if the tp_compare slot is defined, and
dict_richcompare called dict_compare for the latter two because
it couldn't do them itself.  The result was a lot of wasted calls to
dict_compare.  Now dict_richcompare gives up at once the times Python
calls it with LT and GT from try_rich_to_3way_compare(), and dict_compare
is called only once (when Python gets around to trying the tp_compare
slot).
Continued mystery:  despite that this cut the number of calls to
dict_compare approximately in half in test_mutants.py, the latter still
runs amazingly slowly.  Running under the debugger doesn't show excessive
activity in the dict comparison code anymore, so I'm guessing the culprit
is somewhere else -- but where?  Perhaps in the element (key/value)
comparison code?  We clearly spend a lot of time figuring out how to
compare things.

A Mystery:  test_mutants ran amazingly slowly even before dictobject.c
"got fixed".  I don't have a clue as to why.  dict comparison was and
remains linear-time in the size of the dicts, and test_mutants only tries
100 dict pairs, of size averaging just 50.  So "it should" run in less than
an eyeblink; but it takes at least a second on this 800MHz box.

and wrap the body in try/finally to ensure TESTFN gets cleaned up no
matter what.

This closes SF bug #423087.

both weakref.Weak*Dictionary classes.

This closes SF bug #416480.

module for useful constants.