to search on the command line in that case.

possibly being missing.

where it was: it is really a configuration file, not a normal module.

By moving it into Mac/Lib we can now also store the location of bgen
itself in there, which is needed because bgen isn't installed.

Renamed Py_Main to PyMac_Main as it has a different signature than the "normal" Py_Main, and that signature has appeared in a .h file.

will trigger splitting on any whitespace.

M PyShell.py
M rpc.py
M run.py

having it there causes the line to wrap.

on Windows.  The test_sequence() ERROR is easily repaired if we're
willing to add an os.unlink() line to mhlib's updateline().  The
test_listfolders FAIL I gave up on -- I don't remember enough about Unix
link esoterica to recall why a link count of 2 is something a well-
written program should be keenly interested in <wink>.

You'll still have to manually edit it, though...

Builder carbon NIB files from Python. As-is, I may need to twiddle a few
things as he donated this long ago.

Donovan is now one of the four people in the world who know how to drive
bgen!

- steer people away from installing with sudo
- warn that fink-installed software may cause trouble
- explain why you might want a framework build and point people to
  Mac/OSX/README.

people may have (fink, gnu).

see sf #506436

be longer than the old string.

this was trying to assert, but the name it referenced didn't exist.

directly when no comparison function is specified.  This saves a layer
of function call on every compare then.  Measured speedups:

 i    2**i  *sort  \sort  /sort  3sort  +sort  %sort  ~sort  =sort  !sort
15   32768  12.5%   0.0%   0.0% 100.0%   0.0%  50.0% 100.0% 100.0% -50.0%
16   65536   8.7%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%   0.0%  12.5%   0.0%   0.0%
17  131072   8.0%  25.0%   0.0%  25.0%   0.0%  14.3%   5.9%   0.0%   0.0%
18  262144   6.3% -10.0%  12.5%  11.1%   0.0%   6.3%   5.6%  12.5%   0.0%
19  524288   5.3%   5.9%   0.0%   5.6%   0.0%   5.9%   5.4%   0.0%   2.9%
20 1048576   5.3%   2.9%   2.9%   5.1%   2.8%   1.3%   5.9%   2.9%   4.2%

The best indicators are those that take significant time (larger i), and
where sort doesn't do very few compares (so *sort and ~sort benefit most
reliably).  The large numbers are due to roundoff noise combined with
platform variability; e.g., the 14.3% speedup for %sort at i=17 reflects
a printed elapsed time of 0.18 seconds falling to 0.17, but a change in
the last digit isn't really meaningful (indeed, if it really took 0.175
seconds, one electron having a lazy nanosecond could shift it to either
value <wink>).  Similarly the 25% at 3sort i=17 was a meaningless change
from 0.05 to 0.04.  However, almost all the "meaningless changes" were
in the same direction, which is good.  The before-and-after times for
*sort are clearest:

before after
  0.18  0.16
  0.25  0.23
  0.54  0.50
  1.18  1.11
  2.57  2.44
  5.58  5.30