There's little point to cut that down.

Feedback from:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/4961#note_12794221

If we're using `can?` it would look weird to use 409

And show information about locked status.

Help! This looks bad :o

Because invalid actions shouldn't be shown on the page.

Feedback:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/4961#note_12738607

The regression was introduced by:

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/1b8f52d9206bdf19c0dde04505c4c0b1cf46cfbe

I did that because there's a test specifying that a shared runner cannot
be enabled, in the API. So I assume that is the case for non-admin, but
admins should be able to do so anyway.

Also added a test to make sure this won't regress again.

Closes #19039

Rename Licenses API to License Templates API

## What does this MR do?

Earlier I renamed this in EE, thinking license templates was an EE-only feature. This backports that change to CE. Thanks to @vsizov for pointing out this error.

See https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests/400 for the EE merge request. 

See merge request !4957

Check for conflict with wiki projects when creating a new project.

## What does this MR do?
Check for conflict with wiki projects when creating a new project
## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
No
## Why was this MR needed?
To avoid exposing the information from the wiki repository of other project
## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#18398 
## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screen_Shot_2016-06-24_at_6.03.49_PM](/uploads/7bf55e5159bf0c2b653b8f4f941f72fc/Screen_Shot_2016-06-24_at_6.03.49_PM.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

See merge request !4918

Fix visibility of snippets when searching

Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18997

See merge request !1972

Fix an information disclosure when requesting access to a group containing private projects

Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19102.

The commit speaks for itself:

    Fix an information disclosure when requesting access to a group containing private projects
    
    The issue was with the `User#groups` and `User#projects` associations
    which goes through the `User#group_members` and `User#project_members`.
    
    Initially I chose to use a secure approach by storing the requester's
    user ID in `Member#created_by_id` instead of `Member#user_id` because I
    was aware that there was a security risk since I didn't know the
    codebase well enough.
    
    Then during the review, we decided to change that and directly store the
    requester's user ID into `Member#user_id` (for the sake of simplifying
    the code I believe), meaning that every `group_members` / `project_members`
    association would include the requesters by default...
    
    My bad for not checking that all the `group_members` / `project_members`
    associations and the ones that go through them (e.g. `Group#users` and
    `Project#users`) were made safe with the `where(requested_at: nil)` /
    `where(members: { requested_at: nil })` scopes.
    
    Now they are all secure.

See merge request !1973

Use `have_http_status` matcher where possible

See merge request !4955

Fix rendering of commit notes

See merge request !4953

This fix avoids exposing the information from the wiki repository of other project.

Made the search bar on emoji menu sticky

## What does this MR do?

When scrolling down the emoji menu, the search bar disappears. For better UX, the search bar no stays at the top when scrolling.

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![emoji-sticky](/uploads/a5b4773547d3d67342ddcfc07c8f1568/emoji-sticky.gif)

See merge request !4743

Update omniauth-saml to 1.6.0 to address a security vulnerability in ruby-saml

## What does this MR do?

Updates `omniauth-saml` to bring in the new `ruby-saml` dependency that addresses [CVE-2016-5697](https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-5697)

Fixes #19206 

See merge request !4951

Correctly return todo ID after creating todo

See merge request !4941

Remove duplicate new page btn from edit wiki

## What does this MR do?
Removes duplicate button on wiki page

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #19075 

## Screenshots (if relevant)
![Screen_Shot_2016-06-24_at_9.45.28_AM](/uploads/8dca96c3e75b428d63acaaba6dede9a6/Screen_Shot_2016-06-24_at_9.45.28_AM.png)
![Screen_Shot_2016-06-24_at_9.45.57_AM](/uploads/e6ea97b07e48d2fe6f108d8c5a943583/Screen_Shot_2016-06-24_at_9.45.57_AM.png)

See merge request !4904

Mention gmake

Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-workhorse/issues/46

See merge request !4945

Fix check for existence of New Branch button on Issue page

## What does this MR do?

The condition in [`initCanCreateBranch`][initCanCreateBranch] mistakenly checks `$container` (the New Branch button) for falsy. However JQuery returns an empty array if no matching element was found, so this condition is never met.

## Why was this MR needed?

The wrong condition causes:
* `$.getJSON($container.data('path'))` to be called where `$container.data('path')` is `undefined`
* in this case `$.getJSON` uses `location.href`
* if the current page has a JSON representation, it is fetched and cached by browser and displayed the next time the page is visited (#17365)
* otherwise "Failed to check if new branch can be created" is displayed (#17264)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Fixes #17264 and #17365.

[initCanCreateBranch]: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/v8.8.4/app/assets/javascripts/issue.js.coffee#L102


See merge request !4630

Revert Subresource Integrity pending a fix for Firefox's incorrect hashing implementation.

Per the discussion in #18230, Firefox support is broken :(

cc: @jschatz1 

See merge request !4943

Better debugging for memory killer middleware

This adds more info to the warning messages output by `MemoryKiller`.

Previously only the PID was showed, making it difficult to debug issues like https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/19124

This adds the worker class and job ID to the log messages.

See merge request !4936

Image sizing

## What does this MR do?

Limits image height to fit the screen. The wrapping div is so the image is guaranteed to be a block element without the link area growing to be larger than the image itself.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

Make sure this can't be done in a more performant or concise way with Banzai.

## Why was this MR needed?

Images were displayed at their full resolution, which made it difficult to read issues when the image height was greater than the viewport height (see #18861).

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Fixes #18861.

## Screenshots (if relevant)

Before:

![Screen_Shot_2016-06-20_at_3.25.26_PM](/uploads/158424375ade95adcd337ccd34c48747/Screen_Shot_2016-06-20_at_3.25.26_PM.png)

After:

![Screen_Shot_2016-06-20_at_3.24.57_PM](/uploads/f1a3b5f6442e4e3b1067332a547fb1c8/Screen_Shot_2016-06-20_at_3.24.57_PM.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

cc: @jschatz1 @dzaporozhets @rspeicher

See merge request !4810

Test templates and GitLabCI parser againts each other

## What does this MR do?

Test the available templates against the preprocessor and vice versa

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

The dynamic creation of tests seems a little hacked. Is there a cleaner way?

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added -- Seems unneeded
- [x] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)

See merge request !4898