- 14 Jul, 2017 4 commits
-
-
Nathaniel Caza authored
The current implementation ignores certificates that exist in the login and System keychains. This change adds the missing System and login keychain files to the `/usr/bin/security` command in `execSecurityRoots`. If the current user cannot be obtained, the login keychain is ignored. Refs #16532 Change-Id: I8594a6b8940c58df8a8015b274fa45c39e18862c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36941 Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Samuel Tan authored
The escaper contains information about which templates have already been visited and escaped. This information is necessary to prevent templates that have already been escaped from being over-escaped. However, since we currently create a new escaper each time we execute a template, this information does not persist across multiple template executions. Fix this by saving an escaper in each template name space which is shared by all templates in that name space. While there, fix error message formatting for an escaping unit test. Fixes #20842 Change-Id: Ie392c3e7ce0e0a9947bdf56c99e926e7c7db76e4 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47256Reviewed-by: Mike Samuel <mikesamuel@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
David Chase authored
Previous code failed to account for particular control flow involving nested loops when updating phi function inputs. Fix involves: 1) remove incorrect shortcut 2) generate a "better" order for children in dominator tree 3) note inner-loop updates and check before applying outer-loop updates. Fixes #20675. Change-Id: I2fe21470604b5c259e777ad8b15de95f7706894d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/45791 Run-TryBot: David Chase <drchase@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
If we get an EAGAIN error on an unpollable file, don't try to wait for it to be ready; just return EAGAIN. It's possible that we should instead ensure that when Stdin is a pipe in non-blocking mode, we wait for data to appear. For now take the conservative approach of doing what we did in previous releases. Based on https://golang.org/cl/47555 by Totoro W. Fixes #20915 Change-Id: Icc9e97a5a877b0a3583ec056c35412d1afab62d1 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48490 Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
- 13 Jul, 2017 4 commits
-
-
Kevin Burke authored
Change-Id: I73fdc793bbc3ffe9ace1bfa78799f84c31630d61 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48391Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Change-Id: If9f64fbb78009921e8773124e4e5eb8a871095a5 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48192Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Michael Matloob <matloob@golang.org>
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
CL 44352 changed the behavior of SIGINT, which can break tests that themselves use SIGINT. I think we can only implement this if the testing package has a way to know whether the code under test is using SIGINT, but os/signal does not provide an API for that. Roll back for 1.9 and think about this again for 1.10. Updates #19397 Change-Id: I021c314db2b9d0a80d0088b120a6ade685459990 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48370 Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Ian Lance Taylor authored
It seems that when too much other code is running on the system, the testprogcgo code can overrun its timeouts. Updates #18598. Not marking the issue as fixed until it doesn't recur for some time. Change-Id: Ieaf106b41986fdda76b1d027bb9d5e3fb805cc3b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48233 Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
- 12 Jul, 2017 4 commits
-
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
Usually this test is skipped (on builders and when not root), so people are unlikely to see this error. Updates #19296 Change-Id: I3acb81260034dad8776c305f83d7cbac4b718e75 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48191 Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
Fixes #20948 Change-Id: I222bf101a5c1bdc5cbb0970949070c4b58b9b83b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48190Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
SysV semaphore undo lists should be shared by threads, just like several other resources listed in cloneFlags. Currently we don't do this, but it probably doesn't affect anything because 1) probably nobody uses SysV semaphores from Go and 2) Go-created threads never exit until the process does. Beyond being the right thing to do, user-level QEMU requires this flag because it depends on glibc to create new threads and glibc uses this flag. Fixes #20763. Change-Id: I1d1dafec53ed87e0f4d4d432b945e8e68bb72dcd Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48170 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
To-be-released NetBSD 7.1.1 reportedly fixes the kernel panic that was affecting our builders and is being released because of Go's warning. So, soften our warning. 7.1.1 might work, but I can't get a builder up and running to verify yet as it appears that Anita either doesn't support it yet, or the NetBSD CDN doesn't have the files yet. Change-Id: Ifaafc566879a6afdf1174e545ad10e240da427e8 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47970Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
- 11 Jul, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Austin Clements authored
TestStackGrowth is currently a parallel test. However, it depends on a 20 second timeout, which is already dubious in a parallel test, and became really problematic on slow builders when runtime.GC switched to triggering concurrent GC instead of STW GC. Before that change, the test spent much of its time in STW GC, so it wasn't *really* parallel. After that change, it was competing with all of the other parallel tests and GC likely started taking ~4 times longer. On most builders the whole test runs in well under a second, but on the slow builders that was enough to push it over the 20 second timeout. Fix this by making the test serial. Updates #19381 (probably fixes it, but we'll have to wait and see). Change-Id: I21af7cf543ab07f1ec1c930bfcb355b0df75672d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48110 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Elias Naur <elias.naur@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Local variables can also be relied on the be 64-bit aligned, since they will be escaped to the heap if used with any atomic operations. Also, allocated arrays are also aligned, just like structs and slices. Fixes #18955. Change-Id: I8a1897f6ff78922c8bfcf20d6eb4bcb17a70ba2d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/48112Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Costin Chirvasuta authored
The current description refers to the outermost "frame" which can be misleading. A user reading it can think it means a stack frame. Change-Id: Ie2c7cb4b4db8f41572df206478ce3b46a0245a5d Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47850Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
-
- 10 Jul, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Alessandro Arzilli authored
When a local variable is moved to the heap the declaration position should be preserved so that later on we can assign it to the correct DW_TAG_lexical_block. Fixes #20959 Change-Id: I3700ef53c68ccd506d0633f11374ad88a52b2898 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47852 Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Chase <drchase@google.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
-
- 09 Jul, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Michael Pratt authored
ld.addpltsym adds an R_X86_64_JMP_SLOT dynamic relocation to .rela.plt and uses Addaddrplus to reference the GOT in Elf64_Rela.r_offset. Addaddrplus results in an R_ADDR relocation, which here we transform into an R_X86_64_64 dynamic relocation. This is wrong for several reasons: 1. .rela.plt is not a writable, relro section. It is mapped read-only, causing the dynamic linker to segfault when it tried to handle the relocation. This was the immediate cause of internal PIE cgo crashes. 2. Relocations targetting other reloc sections are, as far as I can tell, undefined behavior in the ELF spec and are unlikely to be a good idea. 3. Even if the relocation did work, it isn't what we want. The relocation, if successfully handled, would have put an absolute address as the JMP_SLOT offset, but it should be the offset from the beginning of the binary, just like any other relocation. What we want is a statically resolved R_ADDR relocation, just as is used below for the R_X86_64_64 relocation. Skipping the .rela.plt allows reloc() to handle these R_ADDR relocations. With this CL, internal PIE cgo binaries work. Updates #18968 Change-Id: Ie74e6fe249e88150baa0e340b1cb128cf7f28673 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47837Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
- 08 Jul, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Josh Bleecher Snyder authored
On a slow or distracted machine, 0.1s is sometimes not long enough for a non-blocking function call to complete. This causes rare test flakes. They can be easily reproduced by reducing the wait time to (say) 100ns. For non-blocking functions, increase the window from 100ms to 10s. Using different windows for block and non-blocking functions, allows us to reduce the time for blocking functions. The risk here is false negatives, but that risk is low; this test is run repeatedly on many fast machines, for which 10ms is ample time. This reduces the time required to run the test by a factor of 10, from ~1s to ~100ms. Fixes #20299 Change-Id: Ice9a641a66c6c101d738a2ebe1bcb144ae3c9916 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47812 Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
- 07 Jul, 2017 8 commits
-
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently, sysmon waits 60 ms during idle before relaxing. This is primarily to avoid reducing the precision of short-duration timers. Of course, if there are no short-duration timers, this wastes 60 ms running the timer at high resolution. Improve this by instead inspecting the time until the next timer fires and relaxing the timer resolution immediately if the next timer won't fire for a while. Updates #20937. Change-Id: If4ad0a565b65a9b3e8c4cdc2eff1486968c79f24 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47833 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently, sysmon relaxes the Windows timer resolution as soon as the Go process becomes idle. However, if it's going idle because of a short sleep (< 15.6 ms), this can turn that short sleep into a long sleep (15.6 ms). To address this, wait for 60 ms of idleness before relaxing the timer resolution. It would be better to check the time until the next wakeup and relax immediately if it makes sense, but there's currently no interaction between sysmon and the timer subsystem, so adding this simple delay is a much simpler and safer change for late in the release cycle. Fixes #20937. Change-Id: I817db24c3bdfa06dba04b7bc197cfd554363c379 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47832 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
This reverts commit 168eb9cf. CL 47831 fixes the issue with plugins on ARMv5, so we can re-enable the test. Updates #19674. Change-Id: Idcb29f93ffb0460413f1fab5bb82fa2605795038 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47834Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
R11 is callee-save in the C ABI, but the temporary register in the Go ABI. Currently it's being clobbered by runtime.addmoduledata, which has to follow the C ABI. The observed effect of this was that dl_open_worker was returning to a bad PC because after it failed to restore its SP because it was using R11 as a frame pointer. Fix this by saving R11 around addmoduledata. Fixes #19674. Change-Id: Iaacbcc76809a3aa536e9897770831dcbcb6c8245 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47831 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Cherry Zhang <cherryyz@google.com>
-
Austin Clements authored
Change-Id: If1c602176e0bea66924983eab8edd5e450228b68 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47792Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
A lot of code that uses runtime.Callers makes assumptions about the result that are not true today under gccgo and will not be true in the future in gc. This adds a section to the release notes discussing how to correctly use runtime.Callers. Change-Id: I96b7c7ef183cee2061442fc3501fceceefa54c09 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47691Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Change-Id: I1c02aa4f7131ae984fda66b32e8a993c0a40b8f4 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47690Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
Fixes #20930 Change-Id: I4a59de0556cffeae9af2eaa41609601e086211b2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47731Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
- 06 Jul, 2017 13 commits
-
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
Fixes #20928 Change-Id: I7f7aafb8ff4b5deb50c286a9ae81c34ee85e56a9 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47730Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Gustav Westling authored
CL 47341 added support for decoding non-padded messages. But DecodedLen still returned a multiple of 5 for messages without a padding, even though it is possible to calculate the len exactly when using NoPadding. This change makes DecodedLen return the exact number of bytes that will be written. A change to the decoding logic is also made so that it can handle this case. DecodedLen now has the same behaviour as DecodedLen in encoding/base64. Fixes #20854 Change-Id: I729e0b1c0946c866fb675c854f835f366dd4b5a4 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47710Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
It already implied that Cmd.Wait is more than os.Process.Wait, but say so explicitly. See https://github.com/golang/go/issues/18874#issuecomment-309921486 Updates #18874 Change-Id: Iaa46defd776ae0be817d9f4466a99ac78cfd672b Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47650Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Gustav Westling authored
CL 38634 added support for custom (and disabled) padding characters when encoding, but didn't update the decoding paths. This adds decoding support. Fixes #20854 Change-Id: I9fb1a0aaebb27f1204c9f726a780d5784eb71024 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47341 Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Austin Clements authored
Currently only the rwmutex write lock prevents descheduling. The read lock does not. This leads to the following situation: 1. A reader acquires the lock and gets descheduled. 2. GOMAXPROCS writers attempt to acquire the lock (or at least one writer does, followed by readers). This blocks all of the Ps. 3. There is no 3. The descheduled reader never gets to run again because there are no Ps, so it never releases the lock and the system deadlocks. Fix this by preventing descheduling while holding the read lock. This requires also rewriting TestParallelRWMutexReaders to always create enough GOMAXPROCS and to use non-blocking operations for synchronization. Fixes #20903. Change-Id: Ibd460663a7e5a555be5490e13b2eaaa295fac39f Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47632 Run-TryBot: Austin Clements <austin@google.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
-
Mikio Hara authored
Change-Id: If5495f66d175bdacebd599abf1e064d2343669c2 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34430 Run-TryBot: Mikio Hara <mikioh.mikioh@gmail.com> TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
ResolveTCPAddr, ResolveUDPAddr, and ResolveIPAddr return at most one address. When given a name like "golang.org" to resolve that might have more than 1 address, the net package has historically preferred IPv4 addresses, with the assumption that many users don't yet have IPv6 connectivity and randomly selecting between an IPv4 address and an IPv6 address at runtime wouldn't be a good experience for IPv4-only users. In CL 45088 (78cf0e56) I modified the resolution of the unspecified/empty address to internally resolve to both IPv6 "::" and 0.0.0.0 to fix issue #18806. That code has 3 other callers I hadn't considered, though: the Resolve*Addr functions. Since they preferred IPv4, any Resolve*Addr of "[::]:port" or "::" (for ResolveIPAddr) would internally resolve both "::" and 0.0.0.0 and then prefer 0.0.0.0, even though the user was looking up an IPv6 literal. Add tests and fix it, not by undoing the fix to #18806 but by selecting the preference function for Resolve*Addr more explicitly: we still prefer IPv4, but if the address being looked up was an IPv6 literal, prefer IPv6. The tests are skipped on machines without IPv6. Fixes #20911 Change-Id: Ib7036cc43182ae4118cd1390c254e17c04a251a3 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47554 Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
Updates #20587 Change-Id: Ie4846f90611390eebf037ffafaed5ddd273565e4 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47551Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
The text before CL 45816 was: -timeout t If a test runs longer than t, panic. The default is 10 minutes (10m). CL 45816 was supposed to be about clarifying test vs test binary, and it did add the clarification of referring to "duration d", but it also introduced incorrect text about timeout 0. The new text in this CL preserves the good change and eliminates the incorrect one: -timeout d If a test binary runs longer than duration d, panic. The default is 10 minutes (10m). For #14780. Change-Id: I4f79d6e48ed9295bc9f34a36aa90d3b03b40d7f5 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47571 Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-
Emmanuel Odeke authored
Following the spec clarification in CL 40393, copy that text to reflect docs to state that the initial capacity of MakeMapWithSize is a hint/approximate. Fixes #19903 Change-Id: I6b3315b8183cafaa61fbb2839a4e42b76fd71544 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46270Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
Fixes #20876 Change-Id: Ic62c4f59e3ddcae891aa9526f9693d233dd524fc Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47552Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org> Reviewed-by: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
-
Brad Fitzpatrick authored
Fixes #20894 Change-Id: I0c0e906964bbd789317d07f245e64e3d61ecfa8c Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47550Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
Russ Cox authored
Go 1.9 beta 2 is already out. It's too late to break code with a change like this. This can be rolled forward for Go 1.10. This reverts commit ae238688. Change-Id: Ib67b8629e3deac5d50d76581aba6a91ca7a7853e Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47570Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
-
- 05 Jul, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Fabian Wickborn authored
The name LabelList was changed to LabelSet during the development of the proposal [1], except in one function comment. This commit fixes that. Fixes #20905. [1] https://github.com/golang/go/issues/17280 Change-Id: Id4f48d59d7d513fa24b2e42795c2baa5ceb78f36 Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/47470Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
-