-
Canjiang Lu authored
The obsolete comment removed in this patch was introduced by 51df1142 ("slub: Dynamically size kmalloc cache allocations"). I paste related modification from that commit: +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA + /* + * Allocate kmem_cache_node properly from the kmem_cache slab. + * kmem_cache_node is separately allocated so no need to + * update any list pointers. + */ + temp_kmem_cache_node = kmem_cache_node; + kmem_cache_node = kmem_cache_alloc(kmem_cache, GFP_NOWAIT); + memcpy(kmem_cache_node, temp_kmem_cache_node, kmem_size); + + kmem_cache_bootstrap_fixup(kmem_cache_node); + + caches++; +#else + /* + * kmem_cache has kmem_cache_node embedded and we moved it! + * Update the list heads + */ + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kmem_cache->local_node.partial); + list_splice(&temp_kmem_cache->local_node.partial, &kmem_cache->local_node.partial); +#ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kmem_cache->local_node.full); + list_splice(&temp_kmem_cache->local_node.full, &kmem_cache->local_node.full); +#endif As we can see there're used to distinguish the difference handling between NUMA/non-NUMA configuration in the original commit. I think it doesn't make any sense in current implementation which is placed above kmem_cache_node = bootstrap(&boot_kmem_cache_node); So maybe it's better to remove them now? Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5af26f58.1c69fb81.1be0e.c520SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.comSigned-off-by:
Canjiang Lu <canjiang.lu@samsung.com> Acked-by:
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
05088e5d