We have three functions in gpio-sim that are called with the device lock
already held. We use the "_unlocked" suffix in their names to indicate
that. This has proven to be confusing though as the naming convention in
the kernel varies between using "_locked" or "_unlocked" for this
purpose. Naming convention also doesn't enforce anything. Let's remove
the suffix and add lockdep annotation at the top of these functions.

This makes it clear the function requires a lock to be held (and which
one specifically!) as well as results in a warning if it's not the case.
The only place where the information is lost is the place where the
function is called but the caller doesn't care about that information
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>