The comment for count_range_bits() mentions that the search is fast if we
are asking for a range with the EXTENT_DIRTY bit set. However that is no
longer true since we don't use that bit and the optimization for that was
removed in:

  commit 71528e9e ("btrfs: get rid of extent_io_tree::dirty_bytes")

So remove that part of the comment mentioning the no longer existing
optimized case, and, while at it, add proper documentation describing the
purpose, arguments and return value of the function.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>