-
Vladimir Oltean authored
Nikolay points out that it is incorrect to assume that it is impossible to have an fdb entry with fdb->dst == NULL and the BR_FDB_LOCAL bit in fdb->flags not set. This is because there are reader-side places that test_bit(BR_FDB_LOCAL, &fdb->flags) without the br->hash_lock, and if the updating of the FDB entry happens on another CPU, there are no memory barriers at writer or reader side which would ensure that the reader sees the updates to both fdb->flags and fdb->dst in the same order, i.e. the reader will not see an inconsistent FDB entry. So we must be prepared to deal with FDB entries where fdb->dst and fdb->flags are in a potentially inconsistent state, and that means that fdb->dst == NULL should remain a condition to pick the net_device that we report to switchdev as being the bridge device, which is what the code did prior to the blamed patch. Fixes: 52e4bec1 ("net: bridge: switchdev: treat local FDBs the same as entries towards the bridge") Suggested-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Acked-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210802113633.189831-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.comSigned-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2e19bb35