We are passing parameters in the wrong order to find next zero bit, and
when it doesn't find anything it returns size (offset in the code), which
is always zero.

For reference the function is defined as:
find_next_bit( *addr, size, offset )

The incorrect parameter order was added by commit abddffdf
("drm/i915/guc: Sanitize GuC client initialization"). Luckily, currently
we only use a single guc client and a single doorbell, which happens to be
zero; therefore it isn't necessary to backport this fix (which would be for
v4.12).

Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170531000546.30762-1-michel.thierry@intel.com