-
Jesper Dangaard Brouer authored
The spin_lock irqsave/restore API variant in skb_defer_free_flush can be replaced with the faster spin_lock irq variant, which doesn't need to read and restore the CPU flags. Using the unconditional irq "disable/enable" API variant is safe, because the skb_defer_free_flush() function is only called during NAPI-RX processing in net_rx_action(), where it is known the IRQs are enabled. Expected gain is 14 cycles from avoiding reading and restoring CPU flags in a spin_lock_irqsave/restore operation, measured via a microbencmark kernel module[1] on CPU E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz. Microbenchmark overhead of spin_lock+unlock: - spin_lock_unlock_irq cost: 34 cycles(tsc) 9.486 ns - spin_lock_unlock_irqsave cost: 48 cycles(tsc) 13.567 ns We don't expect to see a measurable packet performance gain, as skb_defer_free_flush() is called infrequently once per NIC device NAPI bulk cycle and conditionally only if SKBs have been deferred by other CPUs via skb_attempt_defer_free(). [1] https://github.com/netoptimizer/prototype-kernel/blob/master/kernel/lib/time_bench_sample.cReviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/167421646327.1321776.7390743166998776914.stgit@firesoulSigned-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
3176eb82