-
Theodore Ts'o authored
Since the journal inode is already checked when we added it to the block validity's system zone, if we check it again, we'll just trigger a failure. This was causing failures like this: [ 53.897001] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_find_extent:909: inode #8: comm jbd2/sda-8: pblk 121667583 bad header/extent: invalid extent entries - magic f30a, entries 8, max 340(340), depth 0(0) [ 53.931430] jbd2_journal_bmap: journal block not found at offset 49 on sda-8 [ 53.938480] Aborting journal on device sda-8. ... but only if the system was under enough memory pressure that logical->physical mapping for the journal inode gets pushed out of the extent cache. (This is why it wasn't noticed earlier.) Fixes: 345c0dbf ("ext4: protect journal inode's blocks using block_validity") Reported-by: Dan Rue <dan.rue@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Tested-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>
0a944e8a