-
Jason Gunthorpe authored
get_pf_vdev() tries to check if a PF is a VFIO PF by looking at the driver: if (pci_dev_driver(physfn) != pci_dev_driver(vdev->pdev)) { However now that we have multiple VF and PF drivers this is no longer reliable. This means that security tests realted to vf_token can be skipped by mixing and matching different VFIO PCI drivers. Instead of trying to use the driver core to find the PF devices maintain a linked list of all PF vfio_pci_core_device's that we have called pci_enable_sriov() on. When registering a VF just search the list to see if the PF is present and record the match permanently in the struct. PCI core locking prevents a PF from passing pci_disable_sriov() while VF drivers are attached so the VFIO owned PF becomes a static property of the VF. In common cases where vfio does not own the PF the global list remains empty and the VF's pointer is statically NULL. This also fixes a lockdep splat from recursive locking of the vfio_group::device_lock between vfio_device_get_from_name() and vfio_device_get_from_dev(). If the VF and PF share the same group this would deadlock. Fixes: ff53edf6 ("vfio/pci: Split the pci_driver code out of vfio_pci_core.c") Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/0-v3-876570980634+f2e8-vfio_vf_token_jgg@nvidia.comSigned-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
1ef3342a