You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
-
Martin Liška authored
Considering the following testcase: int foo(int a, int b) { for (unsigned i = 0; i < 1000000000; i++) a += b; return a; } int main() { foo (3, 4); return 0; } 'perf annotate' displays: 86.52 │40055e: → ja 40056c <foo(int, int)+0x26> 13.37 │400560: mov -0x18(%rbp),%eax │400563: add %eax,-0x14(%rbp) │400566: addl $0x1,-0x4(%rbp) 0.11 │40056a: → jmp 400557 <foo(int, int)+0x11> │40056c: mov -0x14(%rbp),%eax │40056f: pop %rbp and the 'ja 40056c' does not link to the location in the function. It's caused by fact that comma is wrongly parsed, it's part of function signature. With my patch I see: 86.52 │ ┌──ja 26 13.37 │ │ mov -0x18(%rbp),%eax │ │ add %eax,-0x14(%rbp) │ │ addl $0x1,-0x4(%rbp) 0.11 │ │↑ jmp 11 │26:└─→mov -0x14(%rbp),%eax and 'o' output prints: 8...
1f0e6edc