In all but one instance, mlock_future_check() is treated as a boolean
function despite returning an error code.  In one instance, this error
code is ignored and replaced with -ENOMEM.

This is confusing, and the inversion of true -> failure, false -> success
is not warranted.  Convert the function to a bool, lightly refactor and
return true if the check passes, false if not.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230522082412.56685-1-lstoakes@gmail.comSigned-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport (IBM) <rppt@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>