-
Tariq Toukan authored
Fix the warning below by calling the ptr_ring_consume_bh, which uses spin_[un]lock_bh. [ 179.064300] ================================ [ 179.069073] WARNING: inconsistent lock state [ 179.073846] 4.18.0-rc2+ #18 Not tainted [ 179.078133] -------------------------------- [ 179.082907] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage. [ 179.089637] swapper/21/0 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes: [ 179.095478] 00000000963d1995 (&(&r->consumer_lock)->rlock){+.?.}, at: __page_pool_empty_ring+0x61/0x100 [ 179.105988] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: [ 179.111443] _raw_spin_lock+0x35/0x50 [ 179.115634] __page_pool_empty_ring+0x61/0x100 [ 179.120699] page_pool_destroy+0x32/0x50 [ 179.125204] mlx5e_free_rq+0x38/0xc0 [mlx5_core] [ 179.130471] mlx5e_close_channel+0x20/0x120 [mlx5_core] [ 179.136418] mlx5e_close_channels+0x26/0x40 [mlx5_core] [ 179.142364] mlx5e_close_locked+0x44/0x50 [mlx5_core] [ 179.148509] mlx5e_close+0x42/0x60 [mlx5_core] [ 179.153936] __dev_close_many+0xb1/0x120 [ 179.158749] dev_close_many+0xa2/0x170 [ 179.163364] rollback_registered_many+0x148/0x460 [ 179.169047] rollback_registered+0x56/0x90 [ 179.174043] unregister_netdevice_queue+0x7e/0x100 [ 179.179816] unregister_netdev+0x18/0x20 [ 179.184623] mlx5e_remove+0x2a/0x50 [mlx5_core] [ 179.190107] mlx5_remove_device+0xe5/0x110 [mlx5_core] [ 179.196274] mlx5_unregister_interface+0x39/0x90 [mlx5_core] [ 179.203028] cleanup+0x5/0xbfc [mlx5_core] [ 179.208031] __x64_sys_delete_module+0x16b/0x240 [ 179.213640] do_syscall_64+0x5a/0x210 [ 179.218151] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe [ 179.224218] irq event stamp: 334398 [ 179.228438] hardirqs last enabled at (334398): [<ffffffffa511d8b7>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x1c7/0x790 [ 179.239178] hardirqs last disabled at (334397): [<ffffffffa511d872>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x182/0x790 [ 179.249931] softirqs last enabled at (334386): [<ffffffffa509732e>] irq_enter+0x5e/0x70 [ 179.259306] softirqs last disabled at (334387): [<ffffffffa509741c>] irq_exit+0xdc/0xf0 [ 179.268584] [ 179.268584] other info that might help us debug this: [ 179.276572] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 179.276572] [ 179.283877] CPU0 [ 179.286954] ---- [ 179.290033] lock(&(&r->consumer_lock)->rlock); [ 179.295546] <Interrupt> [ 179.298830] lock(&(&r->consumer_lock)->rlock); [ 179.304550] [ 179.304550] *** DEADLOCK *** Fixes: ff7d6b27 ("page_pool: refurbish version of page_pool code") Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com> Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
4905bd9a