kmap() and kmap_atomic() are being deprecated in favor of
kmap_local_page() which is appropriate for any thread local context.[1]

A recent locking bug report with userfaultfd showed that the conversion of
the kmap_atomic()'s in those code flows requires care with regard to the
prevention of deadlock.[2]

git archaeology implied that the recursion may not be an actual bug.[3]
However, depending on the implementation of the mmap_lock and the
condition of the call there may still be a deadlock.[4] So this is not
purely a lockdep issue.  Considering a single threaded call stack there
are 3 options.

	1) Different mm's are in play (no issue)
	2) Readlock implementation is recursive and same mm is in play
	   (no issue)
	3) Readlock implementation is _not_ recursive (issue)

The mmap_lock is recursive so with a single thread there is no issue.

However, Matthew pointed out a deadlock scenario when you consider
additional process' and threads thusly.

"The readlock implementation is only recursive if nobody else has taken a
write lock.  If you have a multithreaded process, one of the other threads
can call mmap() and that will prevent recursion (due to fairness).  Even
if it's a different process that you're trying to acquire the mmap read
lock on, you can still get into a deadly embrace.  eg:

process A thread 1 takes read lock on own mmap_lock
process A thread 2 calls mmap, blocks taking write lock
process B thread 1 takes page fault, read lock on own mmap lock
process B thread 2 calls mmap, blocks taking write lock
process A thread 1 blocks taking read lock on process B
process B thread 1 blocks taking read lock on process A

Now all four threads are blocked waiting for each other."

Regardless using pagefault_disable() ensures that no matter what locking
implementation is used a deadlock will not occur.

Complete kmap conversion in userfaultfd by replacing the kmap() and
kmap_atomic() calls with kmap_local_page().  When replacing the
kmap_atomic() call ensure page faults continue to be disabled to support
the correct fall back behavior and add a comment to inform future souls of
the requirement.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220813220034.806698-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y1Mh2S7fUGQ%2FiKFR@iweiny-desk3/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y1MymJ%2FINb45AdaY@iweiny-desk3/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y1bXBtGTCym77%2FoD@casper.infradead.org/

[ira.weiny@intel.com: v2]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221025220136.2366143-1-ira.weiny@intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221024043452.1491677-1-ira.weiny@intel.comSigned-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>