Direct reclaim stats are useful for identifying a potential source for
application latency, as well as spotting issues with kswapd.  However,
khugepaged currently distorts the picture: as a kernel thread it doesn't
impose allocation latencies on userspace, and it explicitly opts out of
kswapd reclaim.  Its activity showing up in the direct reclaim stats is
misleading.  Counting it as kswapd reclaim could also cause confusion when
trying to understand actual kswapd behavior.

Break out khugepaged from the direct reclaim counters into new
pgsteal_khugepaged, pgdemote_khugepaged, pgscan_khugepaged counters.

Test with a huge executable (CONFIG_READ_ONLY_THP_FOR_FS):

pgsteal_kswapd 1342185
pgsteal_direct 0
pgsteal_khugepaged 3623
pgscan_kswapd 1345025
pgscan_direct 0
pgscan_khugepaged 3623

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221026180133.377671-1-hannes@cmpxchg.orgSigned-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reported-by: Eric Bergen <ebergen@meta.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>