-
Andy Lutomirski authored
This test passes on 4.0 and fails on some newer kernels. Fortunately, the failure is likely not a big deal. This test will make sure that we don't break it further (e.g. OOPSing) as we clean up the entry code and that we eventually fix the regression. There's arguably no need to preserve the old ABI here -- anything that makes it into a fast (vDSO) syscall with a bad stack is about to crash no matter what we do. Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com> Cc: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/9cfcc51005168cb1b06b31991931214d770fc59a.1435952415.git.luto@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
5e5c684a