-
Lucas De Marchi authored
Register 0x9424 is not replicated on any platform, so it shouldn't be declared with REG_MCR(). Declaring it with _MMIO() is basically duplicate of the GEN7 version, so just remove the GEN8 and change all the callers to use the right functions. Old versions of the gen8 bspec page used to contain a table with MCR registers, apparently implying 0x9400 - 0x94ff registers were replicated. However that table went away and there is no information related to the ranges for gen8 anymore. Moreover the current behavior of the driver wouldn't do anything special for 0x9424 since there is no equivalent table in intel_gt_mcr.c: the driver would just fallback to intel_uncore_{read,write}(). Therefore, do not care about the possible special case for gen8 and just use the register as non-MCR for all the platforms. One place doing read + write is also converted to intel_uncore_rmw(). v2: Reword commit message adding the justification wrt gen8 Fixes: a9e69428 ("drm/i915: Define MCR registers explicitly") Cc: Balasubramani Vivekanandan <balasubramani.vivekanandan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Gustavo Sousa <gustavo.sousa@intel.com> Cc: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com> Cc: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230206165410.3056073-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com (cherry picked from commit 869bace7) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
6a8b2e49