• Ai Li's avatar
    cpuidle: extend cpuidle and menu governor to handle dynamic states · 71abbbf8
    Ai Li authored
    On some SoC chips, HW resources may be in use during any particular idle
    period.  As a consequence, the cpuidle states that the SoC is safe to
    enter can change from idle period to idle period.  In addition, the
    latency and threshold of each cpuidle state can vary, depending on the
    operating condition when the CPU becomes idle, e.g.  the current cpu
    frequency, the current state of the HW blocks, etc.
    
    cpuidle core and the menu governor, in the current form, are geared
    towards cpuidle states that are static, i.e.  the availabiltiy of the
    states, their latencies, their thresholds are non-changing during run
    time.  cpuidle does not provide any hook that cpuidle drivers can use to
    adjust those values on the fly for the current idle period before the menu
    governor selects the target cpuidle state.
    
    This patch extends cpuidle core and the menu governor to handle states
    that are dynamic.  There are three additions in the patch and the patch
    maintains backwards-compatibility with existing cpuidle drivers.
    
    1) add prepare() to struct cpuidle_device.  A cpuidle driver can hook
       into the callback and cpuidle will call prepare() before calling the
       governor's select function.  The callback gives the cpuidle driver a
       chance to update the dynamic information of the cpuidle states for the
       current idle period, e.g.  state availability, latencies, thresholds,
       power values, etc.
    
    2) add CPUIDLE_FLAG_IGNORE as one of the state flags.  In the prepare()
       function, a cpuidle driver can set/clear the flag to indicate to the
       menu governor whether a cpuidle state should be ignored, i.e.  not
       available, during the current idle period.
    
    3) add power_specified bit to struct cpuidle_device.  The menu governor
       currently assumes that the cpuidle states are arranged in the order of
       increasing latency, threshold, and power savings.  This is true or can
       be made true for static states.  Once the state parameters are dynamic,
       the latencies, thresholds, and power savings for the cpuidle states can
       increase or decrease by different amounts from idle period to idle
       period.  So the assumption of increasing latency, threshold, and power
       savings from Cn to C(n+1) can no longer be guaranteed.
    
    It can be straightforward to calculate the power consumption of each
    available state and to specify it in power_usage for the idle period.
    Using the power_usage fields, the menu governor then selects the state
    that has the lowest power consumption and that still satisfies all other
    critieria.  The power_specified bit defaults to 0.  For existing cpuidle
    drivers, cpuidle detects that power_specified is 0 and fills in a dummy
    set of power_usage values.
    Signed-off-by: default avatarAi Li <aili@codeaurora.org>
    Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
    Acked-by: default avatarArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
    Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
    Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
    71abbbf8
cpuidle.c 9.64 KB