-
Martin KaFai Lau authored
The current tc-bpf@ingress reads and writes the __sk_buff->tstamp as a (rcv) timestamp which currently could either be 0 (not available) or ktime_get_real(). This patch is to backward compatible with the (rcv) timestamp expectation at ingress. If the skb->tstamp has the delivery_time, the bpf insn rewrite will read 0 for tc-bpf running at ingress as it is not available. When writing at ingress, it will also clear the skb->mono_delivery_time bit. /* BPF_READ: a = __sk_buff->tstamp */ if (!skb->tc_at_ingress || !skb->mono_delivery_time) a = skb->tstamp; else a = 0 /* BPF_WRITE: __sk_buff->tstamp = a */ if (skb->tc_at_ingress) skb->mono_delivery_time = 0; skb->tstamp = a; [ A note on the BPF_CGROUP_INET_INGRESS which can also access skb->tstamp. At that point, the skb is delivered locally and skb_clear_delivery_time() has already been done, so the skb->tstamp will only have the (rcv) timestamp. ] If the tc-bpf@egress writes 0 to skb->tstamp, the skb->mono_delivery_time has to be cleared also. It could be done together during convert_ctx_access(). However, the latter patch will also expose the skb->mono_delivery_time bit as __sk_buff->delivery_time_type. Changing the delivery_time_type in the background may surprise the user, e.g. the 2nd read on __sk_buff->delivery_time_type may need a READ_ONCE() to avoid compiler optimization. Thus, in expecting the needs in the latter patch, this patch does a check on !skb->tstamp after running the tc-bpf and clears the skb->mono_delivery_time bit if needed. The earlier discussion on v4 [0]. The bpf insn rewrite requires the skb's mono_delivery_time bit and tc_at_ingress bit. They are moved up in sk_buff so that bpf rewrite can be done at a fixed offset. tc_skip_classify is moved together with tc_at_ingress. To get one bit for mono_delivery_time, csum_not_inet is moved down and this bit is currently used by sctp. [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220217015043.khqwqklx45c4m4se@kafai-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com/Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
7449197d