-
Chris Wilson authored
Ideally we only need one semaphore per ring to accommodate waiting on multiple engines in parallel. However, since we do not know which fences we will finally be waiting on, we emit a semaphore for every fence. It turns out to be quite easy to trick ourselves into exhausting our ringbuffer causing an error, just by feeding in a batch that depends on several thousand contexts. Since we never can be waiting on more than one semaphore in parallel (other than perhaps the desire to busywait on multiple engines), just pick the first fence for our semaphore. If we pick the wrong fence to busywait on, we just miss an opportunity to reduce latency. An adaption might be to use sched.flags as either a semaphore counter, or to track the first busywait on each engine, converting it back to a single use bit prior to closing the request. v2: Track first semaphore used per-engine (this caters for our basic igt that semaphores are working). Reported-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Testcase: igt/gem_exec_fence/long-history Fixes: e8861964 ("drm/i915: Use HW semaphores for inter-engine synchronisation on gen8+") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190401162641.10963-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
7881e605