-
Christian Brauner authored
All codepaths that don't want to implement POSIX ACLs should simply not implement the associated inode operations instead of relying on IOP_XATTR. That's the case for all filesystems today. For vfs_listxattr() all filesystems that explicitly turn of xattrs for a given inode all set inode->i_op to a dedicated set of inode operations that doesn't implement ->listxattr(). We can remove the dependency of vfs_listxattr() on IOP_XATTR. Removing this dependency will allow us to decouple POSIX ACLs from IOP_XATTR and they can still be listed even if no other xattr handlers are implemented. Otherwise we would have to implement elaborate schemes to raise IOP_XATTR even if sb->s_xattr is set to NULL. Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner (Microsoft) <brauner@kernel.org>
e499214c