Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Register
  • Sign in
  • L linux
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributor statistics
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
  • Issues 0
    • Issues 0
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
  • Merge requests 0
    • Merge requests 0
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Releases
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Kirill Smelkov
  • linux
  • Repository
You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.
  • linux
  • scripts
  • checkpatch.pl
Find file BlameHistoryPermalink
  • Joe Perches's avatar
    checkpatch: add check for sscanf without return use · 823b794c
    Joe Perches authored Nov 12, 2013
    
    
    Naked use sscanf can be troublesome because the pointed to variables may
    not have been set.
    
    Add a warning when the sscanf return value is not used.
    
    For now, do not add __must_check to the sscanf prototype because that will
    cause a couple of hundred new warnings when compiling a kernel.
    
    Signed-off-by: default avatarJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
    823b794c
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7