• Dan Williams's avatar
    cxl/acpi: Track CXL resources in iomem_resource · 974854ab
    Dan Williams authored
    Recall that CXL capable address ranges, on ACPI platforms, are published
    in the CEDT.CFMWS (CXL Early Discovery Table: CXL Fixed Memory Window
    Structures). These windows represent both the actively mapped capacity
    and the potential address space that can be dynamically assigned to a
    new CXL decode configuration (region / interleave-set).
    
    CXL endpoints like DDR DIMMs can be mapped at any physical address
    including 0 and legacy ranges.
    
    There is an expectation and requirement that the /proc/iomem interface
    and the iomem_resource tree in the kernel reflect the full set of
    platform address ranges. I.e. that every address range that platform
    firmware and bus drivers enumerate be reflected as an iomem_resource
    entry. The hard requirement to do this for CXL arises from the fact that
    facilities like CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE expect to be able to treat empty
    iomem_resource ranges as free for software to use as proxy address
    space. Without CXL publishing its potential address ranges in
    iomem_resource, the CONFIG_DEVICE_PRIVATE mechanism may inadvertently
    steal capacity reserved for runtime provisioning of new CXL regions.
    
    So, iomem_resource needs to know about both active and potential CXL
    resource ranges. The active CXL resources might already be reflected in
    iomem_resource as "System RAM". insert_resource_expand_to_fit() handles
    re-parenting "System RAM" underneath a CXL window.
    
    The "_expand_to_fit()" behavior handles cases where a CXL window is not
    a strict superset of an existing entry in the iomem_resource tree. The
    "_expand_to_fit()" behavior is acceptable from the perspective of
    resource allocation. The expansion happens because a conflicting
    resource range is already populated, which means the resource boundary
    expansion does not result in any additional free CXL address space being
    made available. CXL address space allocation is always bounded by the
    orginal unexpanded address range.
    
    However, the potential for expansion does mean that something like
    walk_iomem_res_desc(IORES_DESC_CXL...) can only return fuzzy answers on
    corner case platforms that cause the resource tree to expand a CXL
    window resource over a range that is not decoded by CXL. This would be
    an odd platform configuration, but if it becomes a problem in practice
    the CXL subsytem could just publish an API that returns definitive
    answers.
    
    Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
    Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
    Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
    Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
    Reviewed-by: default avatarJonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
    Acked-by: default avatarGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
    Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165784325943.1758207.5310344844375305118.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.comSigned-off-by: default avatarDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
    974854ab
acpi.c 12.2 KB