• Benjamin Segall's avatar
    epoll: autoremove wakers even more aggressively · a16ceb13
    Benjamin Segall authored
    If a process is killed or otherwise exits while having active network
    connections and many threads waiting on epoll_wait, the threads will all
    be woken immediately, but not removed from ep->wq.  Then when network
    traffic scans ep->wq in wake_up, every wakeup attempt will fail, and will
    not remove the entries from the list.
    
    This means that the cost of the wakeup attempt is far higher than usual,
    does not decrease, and this also competes with the dying threads trying to
    actually make progress and remove themselves from the wq.
    
    Handle this by removing visited epoll wq entries unconditionally, rather
    than only when the wakeup succeeds - the structure of ep_poll means that
    the only potential loss is the timed_out->eavail heuristic, which now can
    race and result in a redundant ep_send_events attempt.  (But only when
    incoming data and a timeout actually race, not on every timeout)
    
    Shakeel added:
    
    : We are seeing this issue in production with real workloads and it has
    : caused hard lockups.  Particularly network heavy workloads with a lot
    : of threads in epoll_wait() can easily trigger this issue if they get
    : killed (oom-killed in our case).
    
    Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/xm26fsjotqda.fsf@google.comSigned-off-by: default avatarBen Segall <bsegall@google.com>
    Tested-by: default avatarShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
    Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
    Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
    Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
    Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
    Cc: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de>
    Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
    Cc: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>
    Cc: Heiher <r@hev.cc>
    Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
    Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
    a16ceb13
eventpoll.c 64.9 KB