BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868627

[ Upstream commit 02aeb2f2 ]

pinmux_func_gpios[] contains a hole due to the missing function GPIO
definition for the "CTX0&CTX1" signal, which is the logical "AND" of the
first two CAN outputs.

A closer look reveals other issues:
  - Some functionality is available on alternative pins, but the
    PINMUX_DATA() entries is using the wrong marks,
  - Several configurations are missing.

Fix this by:
  - Renaming CTX0CTX1CTX2_MARK, CRX0CRX1_PJ22_MARK, and
    CRX0CRX1CRX2_PJ20_MARK to CTX0_CTX1_CTX2_MARK, CRX0_CRX1_PJ22_MARK,
    resp. CRX0_CRX1_CRX2_PJ20_MARK for consistency with the
    corresponding enum IDs,
  - Adding all missing enum IDs and marks,
  - Use the right (*_PJ2x) variants for alternative pins,
  - Adding all missing configurations to pinmux_data[],
  - Adding all missing function GPIO definitions to pinmux_func_gpios[].

See SH7268 Group, SH7269 Group User’s Manual: Hardware, Rev. 2.00:
  [1] Table 1.4 List of Pins
  [2] Figure 23.29 Connection Example when Using Channels 0 and 1 as One
      Channel (64 Mailboxes × 1 Channel) and Channel 2 as One Channel
      (32 Mailboxes × 1 Channel),
  [3] Figure 23.30 Connection Example when Using Channels 0, 1, and 2 as
      One Channel (96 Mailboxes × 1 Channel),
  [4] Table 48.3 Multiplexed Pins (Port B),
  [5] Table 48.4 Multiplexed Pins (Port C),
  [6] Table 48.10 Multiplexed Pins (Port J),
  [7] Section 48.2.4 Port B Control Registers 0 to 5 (PBCR0 to PBCR5).
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191218194812.12741-5-geert+renesas@glider.beSigned-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Khalid Elmously <khalid.elmously@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kelsey Skunberg <kelsey.skunberg@canonical.com>