When PUTFH is followed by an operation that uses the filehandle, and
when the current client is using a security flavor that is inconsistent
with the given filehandle, we have a choice: we can return WRONGSEC
either when the current filehandle is set using the PUTFH, or when the
filehandle is first used by the following operation.

Follow the recommendations of RFC 5661 in making this choice.

(Our current behavior prevented the client from doing security
negotiation by returning WRONGSEC on PUTFH+SECINFO_NO_NAME.)
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>