In the case where a filesystem is polled to take over the memory failure
and receives -EOPNOTSUPP it indicates that page->index and page->mapping
are valid for reverse mapping the failure address.  Introduce
FSDAX_INVALID_PGOFF to distinguish when add_to_kill() is being called from
mf_dax_kill_procs() by a filesytem vs the typical memory_failure() path.

Otherwise, vma_pgoff_address() is called with an invalid fsdax_pgoff which
then trips this failing signature:

 kernel BUG at mm/memory-failure.c:319!
 invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
 CPU: 13 PID: 1262 Comm: dax-pmd Tainted: G           OE    N 6.0.0-rc2+ #62
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
 RIP: 0010:add_to_kill.cold+0x19d/0x209
 [..]
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  collect_procs.part.0+0x2c4/0x460
  memory_failure+0x71b/0xba0
  ? _printk+0x58/0x73
  do_madvise.part.0.cold+0xaf/0xc5

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/166153429427.2758201.14605968329933175594.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com
Fixes: c36e2024 ("mm: introduce mf_dax_kill_procs() for fsdax case")
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Acked-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@fujitsu.com>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: Goldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de>
Cc: Jane Chu <jane.chu@oracle.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>