-
Jon Bloomfield authored
Hook up the flags to allow read-only ppGTT mappings for gen8+ v2: Include a selftest to check that writes to a readonly PTE are dropped v3: Don't duplicate cpu_check() as we can just reuse it, and even worse don't wholesale copy the theory-of-operation comment from igt_ctx_exec without changing it to explain the intention behind the new test! v4: Joonas really likes magic mystery values Signed-off-by: Jon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180712185315.3288-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (backported from commit 250f8c81) CVE-2019-0155 [tjaalton: backport to i915_bpo - ggtt_vm doesn't exist, use ggtt->base - dev_priv doesn't have gtt, use ggtt instead] Signed-off-by: Timo Aaltonen <timo.aaltonen@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
aeeaf9ba