-
Wayne Lin authored
[Why] If the payload_state is DP_PAYLOAD_DELETE_LOCAL in series, current code doesn't delete the payload at current index and just move the index to next one after shuffling payloads. [How] Drop the i++ increasing part in for loop head and decide whether to increase the index or not according to payload_state of current payload. Changes since v1: * Refine the code to have it easy reading * Amend the commit message to meet the way code is modified now. Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Fixes: 706246c7 ("drm/dp_mst: Refactor drm_dp_update_payload_part1()") Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Juston Li <juston.li@intel.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.1+ [Added cc for stable] Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191203042423.5961-1-Wayne.Lin@amd.com
e5a6ca27