Compiling nolibc for rv32 got such errors:

    In file included from nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/nolibc.h:99,
                     from nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/errno.h:26,
                     from nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/stdio.h:14,
                     from tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c:12:
    nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/sys.h:946:2: error: #error Neither __NR_ppoll nor __NR_poll defined, cannot implement sys_poll()
      946 | #error Neither __NR_ppoll nor __NR_poll defined, cannot implement sys_poll()
          |  ^~~~~
    nolibc/sysroot/riscv/include/sys.h:1062:2: error: #error None of __NR_select, __NR_pselect6, nor __NR__newselect defined, cannot implement sys_select()
     1062 | #error None of __NR_select, __NR_pselect6, nor __NR__newselect defined, cannot implement sys_select()

If a syscall is not supported by a target platform, 'return -ENOSYS' is
better than '#error', which lets the other syscalls work as-is and
allows developers to fix up the test failures reported by nolibc-test
one by one later.

This converts all of the '#error' to 'return -ENOSYS', so, all of the
'#error' failures are fixed.
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/5e7d2adf-e96f-41ca-a4c6-5c87a25d4c9c@app.fastmail.com/Reviewed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>