-
Joonsoo Kim authored
Patch series "workingset protection/detection on the anonymous LRU list", v7. * PROBLEM In current implementation, newly created or swap-in anonymous page is started on the active list. Growing the active list results in rebalancing active/inactive list so old pages on the active list are demoted to the inactive list. Hence, hot page on the active list isn't protected at all. Following is an example of this situation. Assume that 50 hot pages on active list and system can contain total 100 pages. Numbers denote the number of pages on active/inactive list (active | inactive). (h) stands for hot pages and (uo) stands for used-once pages. 1. 50 hot pages on active list 50(h) | 0 2. workload: 50 newly created (used-once) pages 50(uo) | 50(h) 3. workload: another 50 newly created (used-once) pages 50(uo) | 50(uo), swap-out 50(h) As we can see, hot pages are swapped-out and it would cause swap-in later. * SOLUTION Since this is what we want to avoid, this patchset implements workingset protection. Like as the file LRU list, newly created or swap-in anonymous page is started on the inactive list. Also, like as the file LRU list, if enough reference happens, the page will be promoted. This simple modification changes the above example as following. 1. 50 hot pages on active list 50(h) | 0 2. workload: 50 newly created (used-once) pages 50(h) | 50(uo) 3. workload: another 50 newly created (used-once) pages 50(h) | 50(uo), swap-out 50(uo) hot pages remains in the active list. :) * EXPERIMENT I tested this scenario on my test bed and confirmed that this problem happens on current implementation. I also checked that it is fixed by this patchset. * SUBJECT workingset detection * PROBLEM Later part of the patchset implements the workingset detection for the anonymous LRU list. There is a corner case that workingset protection could cause thrashing. If we can avoid thrashing by workingset detection, we can get the better performance. Following is an example of thrashing due to the workingset protection. 1. 50 hot pages on active list 50(h) | 0 2. workload: 50 newly created (will be hot) pages 50(h) | 50(wh) 3. workload: another 50 newly created (used-once) pages 50(h) | 50(uo), swap-out 50(wh) 4. workload: 50 (will be hot) pages 50(h) | 50(wh), swap-in 50(wh) 5. workload: another 50 newly created (used-once) pages 50(h) | 50(uo), swap-out 50(wh) 6. repeat 4, 5 Without workingset detection, this kind of workload cannot be promoted and thrashing happens forever. * SOLUTION Therefore, this patchset implements workingset detection. All the infrastructure for workingset detecion is already implemented, so there is not much work to do. First, extend workingset detection code to deal with the anonymous LRU list. Then, make swap cache handles the exceptional value for the shadow entry. Lastly, install/retrieve the shadow value into/from the swap cache and check the refault distance. * EXPERIMENT I made a test program to imitates above scenario and confirmed that problem exists. Then, I checked that this patchset fixes it. My test setup is a virtual machine with 8 cpus and 6100MB memory. But, the amount of the memory that the test program can use is about 280 MB. This is because the system uses large ram-backed swap and large ramdisk to capture the trace. Test scenario is like as below. 1. allocate cold memory (512MB) 2. allocate hot-1 memory (96MB) 3. activate hot-1 memory (96MB) 4. allocate another hot-2 memory (96MB) 5. access cold memory (128MB) 6. access hot-2 memory (96MB) 7. repeat 5, 6 Since hot-1 memory (96MB) is on the active list, the inactive list can contains roughly 190MB pages. hot-2 memory's re-access interval (96+128 MB) is more 190MB, so it cannot be promoted without workingset detection and swap-in/out happens repeatedly. With this patchset, workingset detection works and promotion happens. Therefore, swap-in/out occurs less. Here is the result. (average of 5 runs) type swap-in swap-out base 863240 989945 patch 681565 809273 As we can see, patched kernel do less swap-in/out. * OVERALL TEST (ebizzy using modified random function) ebizzy is the test program that main thread allocates lots of memory and child threads access them randomly during the given times. Swap-in will happen if allocated memory is larger than the system memory. The random function that represents the zipf distribution is used to make hot/cold memory. Hot/cold ratio is controlled by the parameter. If the parameter is high, hot memory is accessed much larger than cold one. If the parameter is low, the number of access on each memory would be similar. I uses various parameters in order to show the effect of patchset on various hot/cold ratio workload. My test setup is a virtual machine with 8 cpus, 1024 MB memory and 5120 MB ram swap. Result format is as following. param: 1-1024-0.1 - 1 (number of thread) - 1024 (allocated memory size, MB) - 0.1 (zipf distribution alpha, 0.1 works like as roughly uniform random, 1.3 works like as small portion of memory is hot and the others are cold) pswpin: smaller is better std: standard deviation improvement: negative is better * single thread param pswpin std improvement base 1-1024.0-0.1 14101983.40 79441.19 prot 1-1024.0-0.1 14065875.80 136413.01 ( -0.26 ) detect 1-1024.0-0.1 13910435.60 100804.82 ( -1.36 ) base 1-1024.0-0.7 7998368.80 43469.32 prot 1-1024.0-0.7 7622245.80 88318.74 ( -4.70 ) detect 1-1024.0-0.7 7618515.20 59742.07 ( -4.75 ) base 1-1024.0-1.3 1017400.80 38756.30 prot 1-1024.0-1.3 940464.60 29310.69 ( -7.56 ) detect 1-1024.0-1.3 945511.40 24579.52 ( -7.07 ) base 1-1280.0-0.1 22895541.40 50016.08 prot 1-1280.0-0.1 22860305.40 51952.37 ( -0.15 ) detect 1-1280.0-0.1 22705565.20 93380.35 ( -0.83 ) base 1-1280.0-0.7 13717645.60 46250.65 prot 1-1280.0-0.7 12935355.80 64754.43 ( -5.70 ) detect 1-1280.0-0.7 13040232.00 63304.00 ( -4.94 ) base 1-1280.0-1.3 1654251.40 4159.68 prot 1-1280.0-1.3 1522680.60 33673.50 ( -7.95 ) detect 1-1280.0-1.3 1599207.00 70327.89 ( -3.33 ) base 1-1536.0-0.1 31621775.40 31156.28 prot 1-1536.0-0.1 31540355.20 62241.36 ( -0.26 ) detect 1-1536.0-0.1 31420056.00 123831.27 ( -0.64 ) base 1-1536.0-0.7 19620760.60 60937.60 prot 1-1536.0-0.7 18337839.60 56102.58 ( -6.54 ) detect 1-1536.0-0.7 18599128.00 75289.48 ( -5.21 ) base 1-1536.0-1.3 2378142.40 20994.43 prot 1-1536.0-1.3 2166260.60 48455.46 ( -8.91 ) detect 1-1536.0-1.3 2183762.20 16883.24 ( -8.17 ) base 1-1792.0-0.1 40259714.80 90750.70 prot 1-1792.0-0.1 40053917.20 64509.47 ( -0.51 ) detect 1-1792.0-0.1 39949736.40 104989.64 ( -0.77 ) base 1-1792.0-0.7 25704884.40 69429.68 prot 1-1792.0-0.7 23937389.00 79945.60 ( -6.88 ) detect 1-1792.0-0.7 24271902.00 35044.30 ( -5.57 ) base 1-1792.0-1.3 3129497.00 32731.86 prot 1-1792.0-1.3 2796994.40 19017.26 ( -10.62 ) detect 1-1792.0-1.3 2886840.40 33938.82 ( -7.75 ) base 1-2048.0-0.1 48746924.40 50863.88 prot 1-2048.0-0.1 48631954.40 24537.30 ( -0.24 ) detect 1-2048.0-0.1 48509419.80 27085.34 ( -0.49 ) base 1-2048.0-0.7 32046424.40 78624.22 prot 1-2048.0-0.7 29764182.20 86002.26 ( -7.12 ) detect 1-2048.0-0.7 30250315.80 101282.14 ( -5.60 ) base 1-2048.0-1.3 3916723.60 24048.55 prot 1-2048.0-1.3 3490781.60 33292.61 ( -10.87 ) detect 1-2048.0-1.3 3585002.20 44942.04 ( -8.47 ) * multi thread param pswpin std improvement base 8-1024.0-0.1 16219822.60 329474.01 prot 8-1024.0-0.1 15959494.00 654597.45 ( -1.61 ) detect 8-1024.0-0.1 15773790.80 502275.25 ( -2.75 ) base 8-1024.0-0.7 9174107.80 537619.33 prot 8-1024.0-0.7 8571915.00 385230.08 ( -6.56 ) detect 8-1024.0-0.7 8489484.20 364683.00 ( -7.46 ) base 8-1024.0-1.3 1108495.60 83555.98 prot 8-1024.0-1.3 1038906.20 63465.20 ( -6.28 ) detect 8-1024.0-1.3 941817.80 32648.80 ( -15.04 ) base 8-1280.0-0.1 25776114.20 450480.45 prot 8-1280.0-0.1 25430847.00 465627.07 ( -1.34 ) detect 8-1280.0-0.1 25282555.00 465666.55 ( -1.91 ) base 8-1280.0-0.7 15218968.00 702007.69 prot 8-1280.0-0.7 13957947.80 492643.86 ( -8.29 ) detect 8-1280.0-0.7 14158331.20 238656.02 ( -6.97 ) base 8-1280.0-1.3 1792482.80 30512.90 prot 8-1280.0-1.3 1577686.40 34002.62 ( -11.98 ) detect 8-1280.0-1.3 1556133.00 22944.79 ( -13.19 ) base 8-1536.0-0.1 33923761.40 575455.85 prot 8-1536.0-0.1 32715766.20 300633.51 ( -3.56 ) detect 8-1536.0-0.1 33158477.40 117764.51 ( -2.26 ) base 8-1536.0-0.7 20628907.80 303851.34 prot 8-1536.0-0.7 19329511.20 341719.31 ( -6.30 ) detect 8-1536.0-0.7 20013934.00 385358.66 ( -2.98 ) base 8-1536.0-1.3 2588106.40 130769.20 prot 8-1536.0-1.3 2275222.40 89637.06 ( -12.09 ) detect 8-1536.0-1.3 2365008.40 124412.55 ( -8.62 ) base 8-1792.0-0.1 43328279.20 946469.12 prot 8-1792.0-0.1 41481980.80 525690.89 ( -4.26 ) detect 8-1792.0-0.1 41713944.60 406798.93 ( -3.73 ) base 8-1792.0-0.7 27155647.40 536253.57 prot 8-1792.0-0.7 24989406.80 502734.52 ( -7.98 ) detect 8-1792.0-0.7 25524806.40 263237.87 ( -6.01 ) base 8-1792.0-1.3 3260372.80 137907.92 prot 8-1792.0-1.3 2879187.80 63597.26 ( -11.69 ) detect 8-1792.0-1.3 2892962.20 33229.13 ( -11.27 ) base 8-2048.0-0.1 50583989.80 710121.48 prot 8-2048.0-0.1 49599984.40 228782.42 ( -1.95 ) detect 8-2048.0-0.1 50578596.00 660971.66 ( -0.01 ) base 8-2048.0-0.7 33765479.60 812659.55 prot 8-2048.0-0.7 30767021.20 462907.24 ( -8.88 ) detect 8-2048.0-0.7 32213068.80 211884.24 ( -4.60 ) base 8-2048.0-1.3 3941675.80 28436.45 prot 8-2048.0-1.3 3538742.40 76856.08 ( -10.22 ) detect 8-2048.0-1.3 3579397.80 58630.95 ( -9.19 ) As we can see, all the cases show improvement. Especially, test case with zipf distribution 1.3 show more improvements. It means that if there is a hot/cold tendency in anon pages, this patchset works better. This patch (of 6): Current implementation of LRU management for anonymous page has some problems. Most important one is that it doesn't protect the workingset, that is, pages on the active LRU list. Although, this problem will be fixed in the following patchset, the preparation is required and this patch does it. What following patch does is to implement workingset protection. After the following patchset, newly created or swap-in pages will start their lifetime on the inactive list. If inactive list is too small, there is not enough chance to be referenced and the page cannot become the workingset. In order to provide the newly anonymous or swap-in pages enough chance to be referenced again, this patch makes active/inactive LRU ratio as 1:1. This is just a temporary measure. Later patch in the series introduces workingset detection for anonymous LRU that will be used to better decide if pages should start on the active and inactive list. Afterwards this patch is effectively reverted. Signed-off-by:
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by:
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by:
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1595490560-15117-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1595490560-15117-2-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.comSigned-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
ccc5dc67