-
Jeff Layton authored
There is a possible race in how the nfs_invalidate_mapping function is handled. Currently, we go and invalidate the pages in the file and then clear NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA. The problem is that it's possible for a stale page to creep into the mapping after the page was invalidated (i.e., via readahead). If another writer comes along and sets the flag after that happens but before invalidate_inode_pages2 returns then we could clear the flag without the cache having been properly invalidated. So, we must clear the flag first and then invalidate the pages. Doing this however, opens another race: It's possible to have two concurrent read() calls that end up in nfs_revalidate_mapping at the same time. The first one clears the NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA flag and then goes to call nfs_invalidate_mapping. Just before calling that though, the other task races in, checks the flag and finds it cleared. At that point, it trusts that the mapping is good and gets the lock on the page, allowing the read() to be satisfied from the cache even though the data is no longer valid. These effects are easily manifested by running diotest3 from the LTP test suite on NFS. That program does a series of DIO writes and buffered reads. The operations are serialized and page-aligned but the existing code fails the test since it occasionally allows a read to come out of the cache incorrectly. While mixing direct and buffered I/O isn't recommended, I believe it's possible to hit this in other ways that just use buffered I/O, though that situation is much harder to reproduce. The problem is that the checking/clearing of that flag and the invalidation of the mapping really need to be atomic. Fix this by serializing concurrent invalidations with a bitlock. At the same time, we also need to allow other places that check NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA to check whether we might be in the middle of invalidating the file, so fix up a couple of places that do that to look for the new NFS_INO_INVALIDATING flag. Doing this requires us to be careful not to set the bitlock unnecessarily, so this code only does that if it believes it will be doing an invalidation. Signed-off-by:
Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
d529ef83