-
Jiri Olsa authored
Currently we can hit following assert when running numa bench: $ perf bench numa mem -p 3 -t 1 -P 512 -s 100 -zZ0cm --thp 1 perf: bench/numa.c:1577: __bench_numa: Assertion `!(!(((wait_stat) & 0x7f) == 0))' failed. The assertion is correct, because we hit the SIGFPE in following line: Thread 2.2 "thread 0/0" received signal SIGFPE, Arithmetic exception. [Switching to Thread 0x7fffd28c6700 (LWP 11750)] 0x000.. in worker_thread (__tdata=0x7.. ) at bench/numa.c:1257 1257 td->speed_gbs = bytes_done / (td->runtime_ns / NSEC_PER_SEC) / 1e9; We don't check if the runtime is actually bigger than 1 second, and thus this might end up with zero division within FPU. Adding the check to prevent this. Signed-off-by:
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180620094036.17278-1-jolsa@kernel.orgSigned-off-by:
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
98310707