As unlock_up() is written as

for () {
   if (!path->locks[i])
       break;
   ...
   if (... && path->locks[i]) {
   }
}

Apparently, @path->locks[i] is always true at this 'if'.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>