Closer inspection of the Xen code shows that we aren't supposed to be
using the XEN_RUNSTATE_UPDATE flag unconditionally. It should be
explicitly enabled by guests through the HYPERVISOR_vm_assist hypercall.
If we randomly set the top bit of ->state_entry_time for a guest that
hasn't asked for it and doesn't expect it, that could make the runtimes
fail to add up and confuse the guest. Without the flag it's perfectly
safe for a vCPU to read its own vcpu_runstate_info; just not for one
vCPU to read *another's*.

I briefly pondered adding a word for the whole set of VMASST_TYPE_*
flags but the only one we care about for HVM guests is this, so it
seemed a bit pointless.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw@amazon.co.uk>
Message-Id: <20221127122210.248427-3-dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>