-
Michal Hocko authored
Jan has noticed that pte_pfn and co. resp. pfn_pte are incorrect for CONFIG_PAE because phys_addr_t is wider than unsigned long and so the pte_val reps. shift left would get truncated. Fix this up by using proper types. Fixes: 6b28baca ("x86/speculation/l1tf: Protect PROT_NONE PTEs against speculation") Reported-by: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
e14d7dfb