-
Abel Wu authored
Since the RB-tree is now sorted by deadline, let's first try the leftmost entity which has the earliest virtual deadline. I've done some benchmarks to see its effectiveness. All the benchmarks are done inside a normal cpu cgroup in a clean environment with cpu turbo disabled, on a dual-CPU Intel Xeon(R) Platinum 8260 with 2 NUMA nodes each of which has 24C/48T. hackbench: process/thread + pipe/socket + 1/2/4/8 groups netperf: TCP/UDP + STREAM/RR + 24/48/72/96/192 threads tbench: loopback 24/48/72/96/192 threads schbench: 1/2/4/8 mthreads direct: cfs_rq has only one entity parity: RUN_TO_PARITY fast: O(1) fastpath slow: heap search (%) direct parity fast slow hackbench 92.95 2.02 4.91 0.12 netperf 68.08 6.60 24.18 1.14 tbench 67.55 11.22 20.61 0.62 schbench 69.91 2.65 25.73 1.71 The above results indicate that this fastpath really makes task selection more efficient. Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231115033647.80785-4-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com
ee4373dc