Christoph noticed that the xfs_attr_is_leaf in xfs_attr_get_ilocked can
access the incore extent tree of the attr fork, but nothing in the
xfs_attr_get path guarantees that the incore tree is actually loaded.

Most of the time it is, but seeing as xfs_attr_is_leaf ignores the
return value of xfs_iext_get_extent I guess we've been making choices
based on random stack contents and nobody's complained?
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>