-
Brett Creeley authored
The current MSI-X enablement logic tries to enable best-case MSI-X vectors and if that fails we only support a bare-minimum set. This includes a single MSI-X for 1 Tx and 1 Rx queue and a single MSI-X for the OICR interrupt. Unfortunately, the driver fails to load when we don't get as many MSI-X as requested for a couple reasons. First, the code to allocate MSI-X in the driver tries to allocate num_online_cpus() MSI-X for LAN traffic without caring about the number of MSI-X actually enabled/requested from the kernel for LAN traffic. So, when calling ice_get_res() for the PF VSI, it returns failure because the number of available vectors is less than requested. Fix this by not allowing the PF VSI to allocation more than pf->num_lan_msix MSI-X vectors and pf->num_lan_msix Rx/Tx queues. Limiting the number of queues is done because we don't want more than 1 Tx/Rx queue per interrupt due to performance conerns. Second, the driver assigns pf->num_lan_msix = 2, to account for LAN traffic and the OICR. However, pf->num_lan_msix is only meant for LAN MSI-X. This is causing a failure when the PF VSI tries to allocate/reserve the minimum pf->num_lan_msix because the OICR MSI-X has already been reserved, so there may not be enough MSI-X vectors left. Fix this by setting pf->num_lan_msix = 1 for the failure case. Then the ICE_MIN_MSIX accounts for the LAN MSI-X and the OICR MSI-X needed for the failure case. Update the related defines used in ice_ena_msix_range() to align with the above behavior and remove the unused RDMA defines because RDMA is currently not supported. Also, remove the now incorrect comment. Fixes: 152b978a ("ice: Rework ice_ena_msix_range") Signed-off-by: Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@intel.com> Tested-by: Tony Brelinski <tonyx.brelinski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
f3fe97f6