Commit 023892ec authored by Uwe Kleine-König's avatar Uwe Kleine-König Committed by Linus Walleij

gpio: siox: use raw spinlock for irq related locking

All the irq related callbacks are called with the (raw) spinlock
desc->lock being held. So the lock here must be raw as well. Also irqs
were already disabled by the caller for the irq chip callbacks, so the
non-irq variants of spin_lock must be used there.

Fixes: be8c8fac ("gpio: new driver to work with a 8x12 siox")
Signed-off-by: default avatarUwe Kleine-König <uwe@kleine-koenig.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200211135121.15752-1-uwe@kleine-koenig.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
parent f6e51bb3
......@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ struct gpio_siox_ddata {
u8 setdata[1];
u8 getdata[3];
spinlock_t irqlock;
raw_spinlock_t irqlock;
u32 irq_enable;
u32 irq_status;
u32 irq_type[20];
......@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ static int gpio_siox_get_data(struct siox_device *sdevice, const u8 buf[])
mutex_lock(&ddata->lock);
spin_lock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
raw_spin_lock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
for (offset = 0; offset < 12; ++offset) {
unsigned int bitpos = 11 - offset;
......@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ static int gpio_siox_get_data(struct siox_device *sdevice, const u8 buf[])
trigger = ddata->irq_status & ddata->irq_enable;
spin_unlock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
ddata->getdata[0] = buf[0];
ddata->getdata[1] = buf[1];
......@@ -84,9 +84,9 @@ static int gpio_siox_get_data(struct siox_device *sdevice, const u8 buf[])
* handler of the irq chip. But it doesn't, so we have
* to clean the irq_status here.
*/
spin_lock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
raw_spin_lock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
ddata->irq_status &= ~(1 << offset);
spin_unlock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
handle_nested_irq(irq);
}
......@@ -101,9 +101,9 @@ static void gpio_siox_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
struct gpio_siox_ddata *ddata =
container_of(ic, struct gpio_siox_ddata, ichip);
spin_lock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
raw_spin_lock(&ddata->irqlock);
ddata->irq_status &= ~(1 << d->hwirq);
spin_unlock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
raw_spin_unlock(&ddata->irqlock);
}
static void gpio_siox_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
......@@ -112,9 +112,9 @@ static void gpio_siox_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
struct gpio_siox_ddata *ddata =
container_of(ic, struct gpio_siox_ddata, ichip);
spin_lock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
raw_spin_lock(&ddata->irqlock);
ddata->irq_enable &= ~(1 << d->hwirq);
spin_unlock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
raw_spin_unlock(&ddata->irqlock);
}
static void gpio_siox_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
......@@ -123,9 +123,9 @@ static void gpio_siox_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
struct gpio_siox_ddata *ddata =
container_of(ic, struct gpio_siox_ddata, ichip);
spin_lock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
raw_spin_lock(&ddata->irqlock);
ddata->irq_enable |= 1 << d->hwirq;
spin_unlock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
raw_spin_unlock(&ddata->irqlock);
}
static int gpio_siox_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type)
......@@ -134,9 +134,9 @@ static int gpio_siox_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, u32 type)
struct gpio_siox_ddata *ddata =
container_of(ic, struct gpio_siox_ddata, ichip);
spin_lock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
raw_spin_lock(&ddata->irqlock);
ddata->irq_type[d->hwirq] = type;
spin_unlock_irq(&ddata->irqlock);
raw_spin_unlock(&ddata->irqlock);
return 0;
}
......@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ static int gpio_siox_probe(struct siox_device *sdevice)
dev_set_drvdata(dev, ddata);
mutex_init(&ddata->lock);
spin_lock_init(&ddata->irqlock);
raw_spin_lock_init(&ddata->irqlock);
ddata->gchip.base = -1;
ddata->gchip.can_sleep = 1;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment