Commit 047491ea authored by Jon Maloy's avatar Jon Maloy Committed by David S. Miller

tipc: set link tolerance correctly in broadcast link

In the patch referred to below we added link tolerance as an additional
criteria for declaring broadcast transmission "stale" and resetting the
affected links.

However, the 'tolerance' field of the broadcast link is never set, and
remains at zero. This renders the whole commit without the intended
improving effect, but luckily also with no negative effect.

In this commit we add the missing initialization.

Fixes: a4dc70d4 ("tipc: extend link reset criteria for stale packet retransmission")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJon Maloy <jon.maloy@ericsson.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 28b6bfeb
......@@ -477,6 +477,8 @@ bool tipc_link_create(struct net *net, char *if_name, int bearer_id,
l->in_session = false;
l->bearer_id = bearer_id;
l->tolerance = tolerance;
if (bc_rcvlink)
bc_rcvlink->tolerance = tolerance;
l->net_plane = net_plane;
l->advertised_mtu = mtu;
l->mtu = mtu;
......@@ -1031,7 +1033,7 @@ static int tipc_link_retrans(struct tipc_link *l, struct tipc_link *r,
/* Detect repeated retransmit failures on same packet */
if (r->last_retransm != buf_seqno(skb)) {
r->last_retransm = buf_seqno(skb);
r->stale_limit = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(l->tolerance);
r->stale_limit = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(r->tolerance);
} else if (++r->stale_cnt > 99 && time_after(jiffies, r->stale_limit)) {
link_retransmit_failure(l, skb);
if (link_is_bc_sndlink(l))
......@@ -1576,9 +1578,10 @@ static int tipc_link_proto_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff *skb,
strncpy(if_name, data, TIPC_MAX_IF_NAME);
/* Update own tolerance if peer indicates a non-zero value */
if (in_range(peers_tol, TIPC_MIN_LINK_TOL, TIPC_MAX_LINK_TOL))
if (in_range(peers_tol, TIPC_MIN_LINK_TOL, TIPC_MAX_LINK_TOL)) {
l->tolerance = peers_tol;
l->bc_rcvlink->tolerance = peers_tol;
}
/* Update own priority if peer's priority is higher */
if (in_range(peers_prio, l->priority + 1, TIPC_MAX_LINK_PRI))
l->priority = peers_prio;
......@@ -1604,9 +1607,10 @@ static int tipc_link_proto_rcv(struct tipc_link *l, struct sk_buff *skb,
l->rcv_nxt_state = msg_seqno(hdr) + 1;
/* Update own tolerance if peer indicates a non-zero value */
if (in_range(peers_tol, TIPC_MIN_LINK_TOL, TIPC_MAX_LINK_TOL))
if (in_range(peers_tol, TIPC_MIN_LINK_TOL, TIPC_MAX_LINK_TOL)) {
l->tolerance = peers_tol;
l->bc_rcvlink->tolerance = peers_tol;
}
/* Update own prio if peer indicates a different value */
if ((peers_prio != l->priority) &&
in_range(peers_prio, 1, TIPC_MAX_LINK_PRI)) {
......@@ -2223,6 +2227,8 @@ void tipc_link_set_tolerance(struct tipc_link *l, u32 tol,
struct sk_buff_head *xmitq)
{
l->tolerance = tol;
if (l->bc_rcvlink)
l->bc_rcvlink->tolerance = tol;
if (link_is_up(l))
tipc_link_build_proto_msg(l, STATE_MSG, 0, 0, 0, tol, 0, xmitq);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment