Commit 0593dd34 authored by Martin KaFai Lau's avatar Martin KaFai Lau Committed by Alexei Starovoitov

bpf: Append _recur naming to the bpf_task_storage helper proto

This patch adds the "_recur" naming to the bpf_task_storage_{get,delete}
proto.  In a latter patch, they will only be used by the tracing
programs that requires a deadlock detection because a tracing
prog may use bpf_task_storage_{get,delete} recursively and cause a
deadlock.

Another following patch will add a different helper proto for the non
tracing programs because they do not need the deadlock prevention.
This patch does this rename to prepare for this future proto
additions.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025184524.3526117-3-martin.lau@linux.devSigned-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent 271de525
......@@ -2519,8 +2519,8 @@ extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_this_cpu_ptr_proto;
extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ktime_get_coarse_ns_proto;
extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sock_from_file_proto;
extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_socket_ptr_cookie_proto;
extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_task_storage_get_proto;
extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_task_storage_delete_proto;
extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_task_storage_get_recur_proto;
extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_task_storage_delete_recur_proto;
extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_for_each_map_elem_proto;
extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_btf_find_by_name_kind_proto;
extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sk_setsockopt_proto;
......
......@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static int bpf_pid_task_storage_delete_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key)
}
/* *gfp_flags* is a hidden argument provided by the verifier */
BPF_CALL_5(bpf_task_storage_get, struct bpf_map *, map, struct task_struct *,
BPF_CALL_5(bpf_task_storage_get_recur, struct bpf_map *, map, struct task_struct *,
task, void *, value, u64, flags, gfp_t, gfp_flags)
{
struct bpf_local_storage_data *sdata;
......@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_task_storage_get, struct bpf_map *, map, struct task_struct *,
(unsigned long)sdata->data;
}
BPF_CALL_2(bpf_task_storage_delete, struct bpf_map *, map, struct task_struct *,
BPF_CALL_2(bpf_task_storage_delete_recur, struct bpf_map *, map, struct task_struct *,
task)
{
int ret;
......@@ -322,8 +322,8 @@ const struct bpf_map_ops task_storage_map_ops = {
.map_owner_storage_ptr = task_storage_ptr,
};
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_task_storage_get_proto = {
.func = bpf_task_storage_get,
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_task_storage_get_recur_proto = {
.func = bpf_task_storage_get_recur,
.gpl_only = false,
.ret_type = RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL,
.arg1_type = ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR,
......@@ -333,8 +333,8 @@ const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_task_storage_get_proto = {
.arg4_type = ARG_ANYTHING,
};
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_task_storage_delete_proto = {
.func = bpf_task_storage_delete,
const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_task_storage_delete_recur_proto = {
.func = bpf_task_storage_delete_recur,
.gpl_only = false,
.ret_type = RET_INTEGER,
.arg1_type = ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR,
......
......@@ -1488,9 +1488,9 @@ bpf_tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
case BPF_FUNC_this_cpu_ptr:
return &bpf_this_cpu_ptr_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_task_storage_get:
return &bpf_task_storage_get_proto;
return &bpf_task_storage_get_recur_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_task_storage_delete:
return &bpf_task_storage_delete_proto;
return &bpf_task_storage_delete_recur_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_for_each_map_elem:
return &bpf_for_each_map_elem_proto;
case BPF_FUNC_snprintf:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment