Commit 05cd8469 authored by Charan Teja Reddy's avatar Charan Teja Reddy Committed by Thomas Zimmermann

dmabuf: fix use-after-free of dmabuf's file->f_inode

It is observed 'use-after-free' on the dmabuf's file->f_inode with the
race between closing the dmabuf file and reading the dmabuf's debug
info.

Consider the below scenario where P1 is closing the dma_buf file
and P2 is reading the dma_buf's debug info in the system:

P1						P2
					dma_buf_debug_show()
dma_buf_put()
  __fput()
    file->f_op->release()
    dput()
    ....
      dentry_unlink_inode()
        iput(dentry->d_inode)
        (where the inode is freed)
					mutex_lock(&db_list.lock)
					read 'dma_buf->file->f_inode'
					(the same inode is freed by P1)
					mutex_unlock(&db_list.lock)
      dentry->d_op->d_release()-->
        dma_buf_release()
          .....
          mutex_lock(&db_list.lock)
          removes the dmabuf from the list
          mutex_unlock(&db_list.lock)

In the above scenario, when dma_buf_put() is called on a dma_buf, it
first frees the dma_buf's file->f_inode(=dentry->d_inode) and then
removes this dma_buf from the system db_list. In between P2 traversing
the db_list tries to access this dma_buf's file->f_inode that was freed
by P1 which is a use-after-free case.

Since, __fput() calls f_op->release first and then later calls the
d_op->d_release, move the dma_buf's db_list removal from d_release() to
f_op->release(). This ensures that dma_buf's file->f_inode is not
accessed after it is released.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.4.x-
Fixes: 4ab59c3c ("dma-buf: Move dma_buf_release() from fops to dentry_ops")
Acked-by: default avatarChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarCharan Teja Reddy <charante@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarThomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1609857399-31549-1-git-send-email-charante@codeaurora.org
parent e71ba945
...@@ -76,10 +76,6 @@ static void dma_buf_release(struct dentry *dentry) ...@@ -76,10 +76,6 @@ static void dma_buf_release(struct dentry *dentry)
dmabuf->ops->release(dmabuf); dmabuf->ops->release(dmabuf);
mutex_lock(&db_list.lock);
list_del(&dmabuf->list_node);
mutex_unlock(&db_list.lock);
if (dmabuf->resv == (struct dma_resv *)&dmabuf[1]) if (dmabuf->resv == (struct dma_resv *)&dmabuf[1])
dma_resv_fini(dmabuf->resv); dma_resv_fini(dmabuf->resv);
...@@ -88,6 +84,22 @@ static void dma_buf_release(struct dentry *dentry) ...@@ -88,6 +84,22 @@ static void dma_buf_release(struct dentry *dentry)
kfree(dmabuf); kfree(dmabuf);
} }
static int dma_buf_file_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
if (!is_dma_buf_file(file))
return -EINVAL;
dmabuf = file->private_data;
mutex_lock(&db_list.lock);
list_del(&dmabuf->list_node);
mutex_unlock(&db_list.lock);
return 0;
}
static const struct dentry_operations dma_buf_dentry_ops = { static const struct dentry_operations dma_buf_dentry_ops = {
.d_dname = dmabuffs_dname, .d_dname = dmabuffs_dname,
.d_release = dma_buf_release, .d_release = dma_buf_release,
...@@ -413,6 +425,7 @@ static void dma_buf_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *file) ...@@ -413,6 +425,7 @@ static void dma_buf_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *file)
} }
static const struct file_operations dma_buf_fops = { static const struct file_operations dma_buf_fops = {
.release = dma_buf_file_release,
.mmap = dma_buf_mmap_internal, .mmap = dma_buf_mmap_internal,
.llseek = dma_buf_llseek, .llseek = dma_buf_llseek,
.poll = dma_buf_poll, .poll = dma_buf_poll,
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment