Commit 05d0e62d authored by Ravi Bangoria's avatar Ravi Bangoria Committed by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

perf annotate: Do not truncate instruction names at 6 chars

There are many instructions, esp on PowerPC, whose mnemonics are longer
than 6 characters. Using precision limit causes truncation of such
mnemonics.

Fix this by removing precision limit. Note that, 'width' is still 6, so
alignment won't get affected for length <= 6.

Before:

   li     r11,-1
   xscvdp vs1,vs1
   add.   r10,r10,r11

After:

  li     r11,-1
  xscvdpsxds vs1,vs1
  add.   r10,r10,r11
Reported-by: default avatarDonald Stence <dstence@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRavi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Taeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171114032540.4564-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.comSigned-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
parent af98f227
......@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static void ins__delete(struct ins_operands *ops)
static int ins__raw_scnprintf(struct ins *ins, char *bf, size_t size,
struct ins_operands *ops)
{
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6.6s %s", ins->name, ops->raw);
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6s %s", ins->name, ops->raw);
}
int ins__scnprintf(struct ins *ins, char *bf, size_t size,
......@@ -230,12 +230,12 @@ static int call__scnprintf(struct ins *ins, char *bf, size_t size,
struct ins_operands *ops)
{
if (ops->target.name)
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6.6s %s", ins->name, ops->target.name);
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6s %s", ins->name, ops->target.name);
if (ops->target.addr == 0)
return ins__raw_scnprintf(ins, bf, size, ops);
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6.6s *%" PRIx64, ins->name, ops->target.addr);
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6s *%" PRIx64, ins->name, ops->target.addr);
}
static struct ins_ops call_ops = {
......@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static int jump__scnprintf(struct ins *ins, char *bf, size_t size,
c++;
}
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6.6s %.*s%" PRIx64,
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6s %.*s%" PRIx64,
ins->name, c ? c - ops->raw : 0, ops->raw,
ops->target.offset);
}
......@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static int lock__scnprintf(struct ins *ins, char *bf, size_t size,
if (ops->locked.ins.ops == NULL)
return ins__raw_scnprintf(ins, bf, size, ops);
printed = scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6.6s ", ins->name);
printed = scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6s ", ins->name);
return printed + ins__scnprintf(&ops->locked.ins, bf + printed,
size - printed, ops->locked.ops);
}
......@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@ static int mov__parse(struct arch *arch, struct ins_operands *ops, struct map *m
static int mov__scnprintf(struct ins *ins, char *bf, size_t size,
struct ins_operands *ops)
{
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6.6s %s,%s", ins->name,
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6s %s,%s", ins->name,
ops->source.name ?: ops->source.raw,
ops->target.name ?: ops->target.raw);
}
......@@ -488,7 +488,7 @@ static int dec__parse(struct arch *arch __maybe_unused, struct ins_operands *ops
static int dec__scnprintf(struct ins *ins, char *bf, size_t size,
struct ins_operands *ops)
{
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6.6s %s", ins->name,
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6s %s", ins->name,
ops->target.name ?: ops->target.raw);
}
......@@ -500,7 +500,7 @@ static struct ins_ops dec_ops = {
static int nop__scnprintf(struct ins *ins __maybe_unused, char *bf, size_t size,
struct ins_operands *ops __maybe_unused)
{
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6.6s", "nop");
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6s", "nop");
}
static struct ins_ops nop_ops = {
......@@ -924,7 +924,7 @@ void disasm_line__free(struct disasm_line *dl)
int disasm_line__scnprintf(struct disasm_line *dl, char *bf, size_t size, bool raw)
{
if (raw || !dl->ins.ops)
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6.6s %s", dl->ins.name, dl->ops.raw);
return scnprintf(bf, size, "%-6s %s", dl->ins.name, dl->ops.raw);
return ins__scnprintf(&dl->ins, bf, size, &dl->ops);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment