Commit 06a66b5c authored by Christian König's avatar Christian König Committed by Sumit Semwal

reservation: revert "wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3)" v2

Reverts commit fb8b7d2b
	("reservation: wait only with non-zero timeout specified (v3)")

Otherwise signaling might never be activated on the fences. This can
result in infinite waiting with hardware which has unreliable interrupts.

v2: still return one when the timeout is zero and we don't have any fences.
Reviewed-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Chunming Zhou <david1.zhou@amd.com> (v1)
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarGustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org>
  [sumits: fix checkpatch warnings]
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1478553376-18575-4-git-send-email-alexander.deucher@amd.com
parent 98a6dd90
......@@ -370,10 +370,7 @@ long reservation_object_wait_timeout_rcu(struct reservation_object *obj,
{
struct dma_fence *fence;
unsigned seq, shared_count, i = 0;
long ret = timeout;
if (!timeout)
return reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(obj, wait_all);
long ret = timeout ? timeout : 1;
retry:
fence = NULL;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment