bridge: Handle IFLA_ADDRESS correctly when creating bridge device

[ Upstream commit 30313a3d ]

When bridge device is created with IFLA_ADDRESS, we are not calling
br_stp_change_bridge_id(), which leads to incorrect local fdb
management and bridge id calculation, and prevents us from receiving
frames on the bridge device.
Reported-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no>
Signed-off-by: Toshiaki Makita <makita.toshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>

net/bridge/br_netlink.c

@@ -211,11 +211,26 @@ static int br_validate(struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int br_dev_newlink(struct net *src_net, struct net_device *dev,
+			  struct nlattr *tb[], struct nlattr *data[])
+{
+	struct net_bridge *br = netdev_priv(dev);
+
+	if (tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]) {
+		spin_lock_bh(&br->lock);
+		br_stp_change_bridge_id(br, nla_data(tb[IFLA_ADDRESS]));
+		spin_unlock_bh(&br->lock);
+	}
+
+	return register_netdevice(dev);
+}
+
 struct rtnl_link_ops br_link_ops __read_mostly = {
 	.kind		= "bridge",
 	.priv_size	= sizeof(struct net_bridge),
 	.setup		= br_dev_setup,
 	.validate	= br_validate,
+	.newlink	= br_dev_newlink,
 	.dellink	= br_dev_delete,
 };