Commit 09355f7a authored by Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)'s avatar Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) Committed by Jakub Kicinski

mptcp: pm: fullmesh: select the right ID later

When reacting upon the reception of an ADD_ADDR, the in-kernel PM first
looks for fullmesh endpoints. If there are some, it will pick them,
using their entry ID.

It should set the ID 0 when using the endpoint corresponding to the
initial subflow, it is a special case imposed by the MPTCP specs.

Note that msk->mpc_endpoint_id might not be set when receiving the first
ADD_ADDR from the server. So better to compare the addresses.

Fixes: 1a0d6136 ("mptcp: local addresses fullmesh")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: default avatarMat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMatthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20240819-net-mptcp-pm-reusing-id-v1-12-38035d40de5b@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: default avatarJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
parent ca6e55a7
......@@ -636,6 +636,7 @@ static unsigned int fill_local_addresses_vec(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
{
struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
struct mptcp_pm_addr_entry *entry;
struct mptcp_addr_info mpc_addr;
struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet;
unsigned int subflows_max;
int i = 0;
......@@ -643,6 +644,8 @@ static unsigned int fill_local_addresses_vec(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
pernet = pm_nl_get_pernet_from_msk(msk);
subflows_max = mptcp_pm_get_subflows_max(msk);
mptcp_local_address((struct sock_common *)msk, &mpc_addr);
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(entry, &pernet->local_addr_list, list) {
if (!(entry->flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_FULLMESH))
......@@ -653,7 +656,13 @@ static unsigned int fill_local_addresses_vec(struct mptcp_sock *msk,
if (msk->pm.subflows < subflows_max) {
msk->pm.subflows++;
addrs[i++] = entry->addr;
addrs[i] = entry->addr;
/* Special case for ID0: set the correct ID */
if (mptcp_addresses_equal(&entry->addr, &mpc_addr, entry->addr.port))
addrs[i].id = 0;
i++;
}
}
rcu_read_unlock();
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment