sched/numa: Decay ->wakee_flips instead of zeroing
Affine wakeups have the potential to interfere with NUMA placement. If a task wakes up too many other tasks, affine wakeups will get disabled. However, regardless of how many other tasks it wakes up, it gets re-enabled once a second, potentially interfering with NUMA placement of other tasks. By decaying wakee_wakes in half instead of zeroing it, we can avoid that problem for some workloads. Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com Cc: umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140516001332.67f91af2@annuminas.surriel.comSigned-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment